[opensource] Meeting [12/4]: Abusing the Unix Shell
joseph.181 at osu.edu
Tue Dec 9 21:33:01 EST 2008
It looks like there is some serious knowledge about this subject [graphics
cards] floating around the mailing list. So who wants to tell me how to get
compiz to play nice with my 2 nvidia  cards? will offer a reward of $2
[us] to the person who can tell me how to get desktop effects working across
3 monitors using 2 graphics cards. I'll go out an buy 2 ATI cards if thats
the solution.... I just really only care about having burning windows!!! I
have spent a good amount of time trying to get this to work and still havent
found a solution. Just getting 3 monitors to work at all was a pain... but
now I want to complete the journey by getting compiz to work. The error I
keep getting is "compositing extension not available" or something like
that. It is very annoying and I want to get rid of it. If anyone knows how
to make this work then this is the time to speak up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Wyatt <trent.arms at gmail.com> wrote:
> This got long. Sorry. I'm not really certain what the CW is on drivers
> these days. There are several things I CAN say, however.
> *nVidia's nvidia module: Uses a Really Ugly Hack to do multiple monitors.
> Very poor 2D performance. Doesn't play with compositing or suspend well.
> Sometimes derefs NULL (oops). It's easy to coax into working though. Also
> added video decode acceleration recently.
> *nVidia maintained open kernel module, nv: slow and only does 2D.
> Supports Xv, at least.
> *Open source noveau module: Based on nv, so 2D works and has, in fact been
> improved amazingly as I recall...recently merged into Gallium3D to hopefully
> get THAT stuff accelerated too. Maybe.
> *ATi's (well, AMD's now) fglrx module: Fairly performant when you can get
> it running. It's definitely gotten better about running in some senses--
> it installs mostly cleanly most of the time, though switching from another
> driver or switching to another driver will create...headaches. Supports
> proper xinerama, RandR, and such.
> *Open source radeon module: has supported R100 and R200 GPUs (all radeons
> pre-9500, IIRC) for a while. DRI works and they behave as one would expect
> hardware to behave when its working (generally). Good Job. dri_r300.so
> (Radeon 9500 through...well, apparently everything else, now) works...? It
> worked decently with my X300 in my laptop, at least, but still lags behind
> the closed one. Work is proceeding, though, so that's neat. May be merge
> in radeonhd.
> *Open radeonhd module: being developed on commission by Novell. For newer
> On topic (lol):
> I've learned a lot from this handy...tome. http://tldp.org/LDP/abs/html/
> My favourite shell trick is probably using kill and killall to manipulate
> processes outside of...well, killing them. Also, learning that `--` is bash
> for "Too close for parameters; switching to args" would have been useful
> long before I learned it.
> PS: Sorry, Jim. Damn you, "Reply to all!"
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:51, Jim Dinan <dinan at cse.ohio-state.edu> wrote:
>> Hi Brian,
>> Nope, wallpaper_slideshow isn't a screensaver. It periodically changes
>> your desktop wallpaper for you even while you are using the machine (ie
>> right click on the desktop -> "Change Desktop Background" -> ...).
>> By the way, I had heard that the ATI linux drivers were pretty good
>> these days? Is the conventional wisdom still to stick with Nvidia for
>> accelerated 3d under Linux?
>> Brian Swaney wrote:
>> > This could be a really stupid comment, but I'll post it anyway on the
>> > off chance that it's not.
>> > /Aaron Joseph wrote:/
>> >> I want to try adjusting the refresh rate to be a fraction of a second
>> >> and then try to use frames from a video with the script to see if I
>> >> can get it to the point of displaying a moving image on my desktop.
>> >> Unfortunately I foresee some serious resource usage problems on the
>> >> horizon since this is something that should really be done by writing
>> >> a program in C that does this. But if anyone happens to have a
>> >> supercomputer and can get this going then let me know how it turns out.
>> > If it's the screensaver, and is therefore running in response to the
>> > computer being /idle/, then you should have some extra CPU cylces to go
>> > around. Just run the proper codec and select a matching format file. I
>> > don't think I know enough about bash or videos to point you in the right
>> > direction, but I'm sure there is some string of commands you could use
>> > to display the output of a codec from a large file to your computer
>> > screen. Or you could probably use mplayer with some arguments or
>> > In the case of a low frame-rate, it's probably because of the graphics
>> > card. Mine is a proprietary ATI one, and if I try putting any kind of
>> > video in full screen, the frame rate is pathetic. On that new computer
>> > I'm returning, it has an Intel video card with a driver that (gasp!)
>> > actually works when you're not using Windows Vista. Unlike ATI, its
>> > framerate is significantly less than 1 second. I heard this card isn't
>> > the greatest at performance, but it certainly does the trick for
>> > full-screen videos. With the right video card and maybe a decent
>> > processor, this sort of thing should be doable; better than having a
>> > movie interrupted by a screensaver anyway.
>> > -Brian Swaney
>> Opensource mailing list
>> Opensource at cse.ohio-state.edu
> Opensource mailing list
> Opensource at cse.ohio-state.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Opensource